AL, NL Reveal Starting Lineups, Batting Order for 2025 All-Star Game

The batting orders for the 2025 MLB All-Star Game have officially been revealed ahead of the annual mid-summer classic.

While we learned last week—via fan vote—which players would make up the starting lineups, it's up to the All-Star Game managers to determine the batting orders for the contest.

Said managers—Yankees' Aaron Boone for the American League and Dodgers' Dave Roberts for the National League—revealed their lineups on Monday afternoon. Here's a look at each:

American League Batting Order

Order

Player

Team

Position

1

Gleyber Torres

Detroit Tigers

2B

2

Riley Greene

Detroit Tigers

LF

3

Aaron Judge

New York Yankees

RF

4

Cal Raleigh

Seattle Mariners

C

5

Vladamir Guerrero

Toronto Blue Jays

1B

6

Ryan O’Hearn

Baltimore Orioles

DH

7

Junior Caminero

Tampa Bay Rays

3B

8

Javier Báez

Detroit Tigers

CF

9

Jacob Wilson

Athletics

SS

N/A

Tarik Skubal

Detroit TigersP

P

National League Batting Order

Order

Player

Team

Position

1

Shohei Ohtani

Los Angeles Dodgers

DH

2

Ronald Acuña Jr.

Atlanta Braves

LF

3

Ketel Marte

Arizona Diamondbacks

2B

4

Freddie Freeman

Los Angeles Dodgers

1B

5

Manny Machado

San Diego Padres

3B

6

Will Smith

Los Angeles Dodgers

C

7

Kyle Tucker

Chicago Cubs

RF

8

Francisco Lindor

New York Mets

SS

9

Pete Crow-Armstrong

Chicago Cubs

CF

N/A

Paul Skenes

Pittsburgh Pirates

P

First pitch of the 2025 MLB All-Star Game from Atlanta's Truist Park is at 8 p.m. on Tuesday, July 15.

Cal 'Big Dumper' Raleigh Signed a Toilet Seat at the Little League World Series

Mariners catcher Cal Raleigh has taken the MLB by storm this year. The 28-year-old leads the league in dingers, won the 2025 Home Run Derby, and has his Seattle team firmly in the wild card race as we enter the latter part of the season.

Nicknamed "Big Dumper" for the exact reason you might think, Raleigh has become a fan favorite in baseball circles throughout the 2025 campaign—so much so, that he's now signing .

That's right, while he was in attendance at the Little League World Series ahead of his team's game against the Mets in Williamsport on Sunday, a fan thrusted a piece of their trusty throne in Raleigh's direction as he was signing autographs, and he obliged.

Here's a look at the hilarious interaction, via MLB analyst Ben Verlander on X:

A man of the people, Big Dumper is.

First pitch between Seattle and New York is set for 7 p.m. ET and will air on ESPN. We'll see if Raleigh can homer again.

Yankees Sign Kenta Maeda to Minor League Contract

The New York Yankees are adding a veteran pitcher to the organization, having agreed to sign former Los Angeles Dodgers standout Kenta Maeda to a minor-league contract, according to a report from MLB Japan.

Maeda, 37, has spent the past two seasons with the Detroit Tigers, spending time in both MLB and the minor leagues. In 2025, he's made just seven appearances for the Tigers, logging a 7.88 ERA with eight strikeouts and six walks in 8.0 innings. He started 17 games last season and has a 6.09 ERA.

In his prime, Maeda was a reliable mid-rotation starter. In his best season in 2020, when he was with the Minnesota Twins, the Japan native finished as the runner-up for the American League Cy Young, losing out to Shane Bieber. That season, a shortened 60-game campaign due to the outbreak of COVID-19, he had a 2.70 ERA with 80 strikeouts and 10 walks across 66 2/3 innings and 11 starts.

It's not clear if the Yankees intend to bring Maeda to the Bronx, though he figures to start out in the minor leagues for the time being.

Lessons for life from Vasoo Paranjape

Rohit Sharma reflects on the influence of coach Vasudev Paranjape on his formative years and how it continues to define him as a cricketer today

Rohit Sharma01-Oct-2020Cricket Drona: For the Love of Vasu Paranjape (Penguin eBury Press)I remember very clearly when I met Vasoo Sir [Vasudeo Paranjape] for the first time. There was an under-17 camp at Wankhede Stadium, and out of the thirty probables only fifteen were going to make it to the team. When you’re a kid trying to make your mark in Mumbai cricket, you’re more focused on what you have to do at a trial than on learning about people who are watching you. I knew they were all respected coaches, especially Vasoo Sir, but I had no clue about what cricket he had played or which players he had mentored.Soon after, Vasoo Sir was in conversation with Pravin Amre, who was the chairman of the Junior Selection Committee; he was telling him about me. When Amre Sir started to talk to me about Vasoo Sir and explained who he was and what he had done for Mumbai cricket, I was dazed. I realized that this was a massive opportunity for me. Here was a man whose knowledge of cricket was amazing, and whose mind bordered on cricket-crazy, and I had a chance to absorb what I could. I decided to make the most of this opportunity – to learn, to glean as much as I possibly could from Sir. This was my big moment!Though he mainly had to focus on the playing eleven, I kept trying to find some excuse to be near him and talk to him. Actually, I just wanted him to talk, so I could listen and learn. Remember, we come from the Bombay school of cricket. There is a standard that has been set and these are the people who have done it before us – they played with legends and won everything, every season.He watched me during one of my net sessions at Wankhede, and then something happened. He went to the captain and said, ‘We need to get this kid into the team. You figure out your combination and all that. I won’t interfere. But this boy needs to play. Work with me.’Prashant Naik, who was the captain, came to me. ‘Look,’ he said, ‘I don’t know anything about you and I’ve not heard much about you either, but Vasoo Sir says you have to play. So you’re playing tomorrow.’When I scored a century in an under-17 game in Baroda, I remember Vasoo Sir talking to Kiran More about me. Vasoo Sir saw some spark in me, and he always made it a point to push my case.I got to learn from him how to approach batting in different situations. He always told us: ‘No two situations are the same. Try and read the game – where you are, what you can do for your team and the situation your team is in. Learn this as soon as you can because now is the time to learn, not when you are playing for Bombay or India.’

He protected us from everything. He got negative feedback from selectors, officials, journalists and others, but he just kept it all to himself. When he came to us, he never mentioned a word. It was all batting, bowling, fielding, solving problems.

In so many of my innings for India, there have been instances when I have thought of something that Sir had told me all those years ago and applied that to the present game.When I first met him, I had only played one season of junior cricket. I had no concept of playing for Mumbai or India. But here was this person telling me what I should do, urging me to take small steps ahead. Young players sometimes get overawed and forget that the big things happen only if you do small things perfectly. This is something he always did, as I later realised.When speaking to young players, he knew how to get them to move forward, one step at a time. There is no point telling youngsters about bigger goals at that early a stage in their careers, and he understood that. This is what you call a helping hand. This is just what young sportspersons need.When I go out to the middle, I remember the things Vasoo Sir told me back then. Things like: as a batsman or a captain, if you can’t read the situation, the team is already in trouble; if you’re the boss, you have to walk out like you mean it, otherwise the shoulders of those who follow you will droop.He treated all of us like his own children, not as cricketers. We never felt that we were training under a coach. He was more like a father figure to us. He never uttered an aggressive word, projected no negativity. We lost games, there were people who did not perform consistently, but he never spoke to them harshly. He was always polite and friendly, and that’s what you need at that age. I was lucky to have played under him.I felt no pressure despite the fact that I was playing in the Mumbai atmosphere. All our lives we had been told that if you don’t win the title, it’s not a successful season. We were always reminded of the high standards set by those who came before us. All of us had to play with that in mind. But I can confidently tell you that not for one moment did we feel any pressure from the management, coach or selectors, and that was because of Vasoo Sir. He would speak to all of them, listening carefully to what they had to say and then tell them, ‘Don’t worry, I’ll take care of it.’He protected us from everything. He got negative feedback from selectors, officials, journalists and others, but he just kept it all to himself. We also heard these things. But when he came to us, he never mentioned a word. It was all batting, bowling, fielding, solving problems.Paranjape knew how to get young players to move ahead one step at a time, by setting small, achievable goalsIt’s very important to be able to demonstrate a skill, especially to younger guys, when they’re just not getting it. The worst thing is for the coach to send the wrong message. If a player does not understand, Vasoo Sir would not let him go. If he had to pick up a bat and get in the nets to show the player just how something should be done, he would do that.Our team was the Mumbai gang. But Vasoo Sir could talk to us in Hindi, English, Gujarati and obviously Marathi. Apart from those, he could also speak other languages: fielding, batting and bowling. Everyone got what they needed from him, whether it was information or technical input.Even today, I look forward to any message from Vasoo Sir. Jatin, who has always been around, is my bridge. I always ask him, ‘Anything?’ I know Vasoo Sir watches my games when he can and, trust me, any input he gives me is gold dust. After every innings I wait to hear from him, and if he can’t get through to me because I’m travelling, I wait for Jatin to get in touch.I blossomed as a cricketer in that one season with Vasoo Sir. Whether we won or lost, he would sit us around and talk about the game. After these sessions, we let it all go and went to sleep with a light mind, shedding the baggage and thinking about what we needed and wanted to do the next day. He freed my mind, allowed me to dream about playing for India and showed me the steps I had to take to get there. That’s what Vasoo Sir does to a cricketer.When I look back, I realise how shrewdly Sir had forged the path that led me to the world stage of cricket. I was not from a big club or a big school or a college team. I was an outlier. But Sir’s recommendations to Pravin Amre, Kiran More and Dilip Vengsarkar got people talking about me, and I delivered on that promise. Without Sir by my side in those early years, I would not have been able to achieve as much as I fortunately have.

The audacious, and gloriously disrespectful Rishabh Pant

You don’t do what he did to James Anderson. But then, you’re not Rishabh Pant.

Karthik Krishnaswamy05-Mar-20213:20

#AskMatchDay: Is Pant’s reverse lap the most extraordinary shot in Test cricket?

There’s audacity, and there’s plain disrespect.Rishabh Pant was five years and 72 days old when James Anderson made his England debut.On Friday afternoon in Ahmedabad, Anderson, 38 years and 218 days old and bowling as well as ever, had figures of 17-11-19-2 when he ran in to bowl with an unsullied second new ball. Pant, 23 years and 152 days old, ran down the pitch and smoked him over mid-off, finishing with his back leg in the flamingo position.You don’t do that to Anderson. You don’t do that to Anderson bowling with a new ball. But you aren’t Rishabh Pant.Related

Rishabh Pant to lead Delhi Capitals in IPL 2021

Rishabh Pant has been handled well by India. Ollie Pope and Dom Bess not so much by England

Ravi Shastri: 'Outstanding' Rishabh Pant 'worked his backside off'

Washington Sundar: A batsman blossoming in a bubble of serene self-assurance

Ravi Shastri: India were like 'zombies' in first Test, 'kick in the backside' drove series triumph

To the next ball, Pant took a massive stride forward, perhaps even before Anderson had released. The length was perhaps short of good length, and the line was wide outside off. He was in no position to play that ball, but that’s a problem for other batsmen. For Pant, it was simply a ball he could wallop through cover point, even if it meant he had to reach out with arms at full stretch and address the ball with a flat-bat, topspin slap.At the start of Anderson’s next over, Pant was batting on 89. Perhaps this would bring a measure of restraint to his batting, you might have thought. Particularly since his last eight Test innings had included two dismissals in the 90s, and an unbeaten 89.Restraint? Pant reverse-swept Anderson from the line of the stumps, falling away to the leg side as he did so, and watched the ball fly over the leaping first slip fielder.It was audacious, it was gloriously disrespectful, and it was in every way what we’ve come to expect from Pant.In time, we’ll get used to all the other bits too, because it’s taken more than just edge-of-the-seat shot-making for Pant to average upwards of 60 in these last two series he’s played, against strong bowling attacks in mostly bowler-friendly conditions.Rishabh Pant cuts behind point•Getty ImagesThrough that tour of Australia and this series against England, we’ve begun to understand the logic that underpins nearly every Pant innings. It’s often a logic entirely his own, such as when he decides the best way to deal with the ball turning and jumping out of the rough is to try and hit it for six, repeatedly, even with long-on an deep midwicket back and with India miles away from saving the follow-on.But sometimes, as on Friday, the logic is far more straightforward. This innings was as close as he has ever come to batting like a typical No. 6. The slap-happy finish will live long in the memory, but the build-up was utterly sedate, by his standards, and brilliantly calculated.When Pant walked in, India were 80 for 4, and trailed by 125 on an unusual sort of pitch where there was help for the spinners but also enough to interest the quicker bowlers, with the odd ball seaming or stopping on the batsman or kicking up awkwardly. The old ball was swinging too, and Anderson had exploited this expertly to remove Ajinkya Rahane with what turned out to be the last ball before lunch.Twelve overs after Pant’s entry, Rohit Sharma was out for 49 off 144 balls. He faced 90 balls from England’s fast bowlers and scored 19 runs off them. This was a batsman who came into this game with a series strike rate of 80.98 against fast bowling. The conditions clearly weren’t made for flat-bat drives through the covers. Not just yet, anyway. Pant would have to bide his time. He’d have to take 28 balls to get into double figures.But there were clear incentives in front of him.England had picked only four bowlers, and one of them, Ben Stokes, was an allrounder who had only bowled 15 overs across the first three Tests. They weren’t trusting one of their two spinners, Dom Bess, to bowl a proper bowler’s share of overs.Pant came to the crease in the 26th over of the morning. Anderson was in his seventh over of the day. Stokes had bowled 10 already. Jack Leach, England’s main spinner, had bowled seven. Bess had only bowled two.Pant had arrived at a delicate moment for India. But he had also arrived at a moment when England’s meagre resources were beginning to get stretched, in the hottest stretch of a 38-degree day in Ahmedabad.6:53

Rohit Sharma – I don’t want anyone get upset when Pant gets out playing shots

Those resources had done exceptionally well to restrict India to 56 for 3 in the first 25.5 overs of the day. But there were two more sessions to go, and six more wickets to take, against an India line-up featuring three spin-bowling allrounders at Nos. 7, 8 and 9.By the time England got their next breakthrough, Rohit trapped in front by Stokes’ reverse-swing, they had used up five more overs from Anderson, and brought Stokes on for another spell. They hadn’t yet bowled Leach at Pant, possibly fearing the damage he could do against left-arm spin. So while Pant had to survive a nervy early period against Anderson, he only had to face Bess – who struggled all day to find his length – and the part-time offspin of Joe Root from the other end.By the time India were six down, Stokes had bowled 15 overs in the day, and Pant had moved to 30. The second new ball was 21.5 overs away, which meant at least another hour’s rest for the quicks.This was where India’s batting depth came to the fore. It was like India’s 2018 tour of England in reverse. The visitors had worked their socks off to get into a position of strength, but the home team’s batting simply wouldn’t end. For Sam Curran, substitute Washington Sundar. Another left-hand batsman, blessed with the same crisp timing and an even sounder technique.Sundar and Pant came together with India trailing by 59, but you wouldn’t have guessed it looking at the tone of the game during the early part of their partnership. Bess and Root sent down the first five overs after tea, with plenty of protection on the boundary when Pant was on strike. This was understandable, but it allowed him to get off strike whenever he wished to. He only faced seven balls in those five overs, allowing Sundar to get his eye in against England’s two least threatening bowlers.By the time Leach returned to the attack, the ball was 67 overs old, and was no longer zipping off the track like it had done during his first spell of the day. By the time a tired Stokes returned with five overs to go for the new ball, India’s deficit was down to nine runs. Sundar was batting on 24, and Pant on 55, off 90 balls.Pant would go on to score 46 off his next 28 balls. He was done waiting and watching. He was done respecting the bowling, the situation, and his elders.

New South Wales out to prove depth of youthful batting in Sheffield Shield final

Being bowled out for 32 against Tasmania, along with IPL absences, heralded a new-look top order

Daniel Brettig14-Apr-2021One of the most famous sporting victories of recent history was the curse-breaking campaign of the 2016 Chicago Cubs to win the Major League baseball club’s first World Series in more than a century. It was built largely upon a formula of marrying up a young and dynamic batting and fielding line-up to a seasoned and powerful pitching roster: young hitters, old pitchers.That formula is not a million miles from the one that New South Wales will take into this week’s Sheffield Shield final. The success or otherwise of the approach will likely give pause to other states at a time when Australian cricket is looking ever more fervently for a fresh batting generation to replenish the huge gaps likely to be left by the likes of David Warner and Steven Smith in coming years.It was only a matter of weeks ago that Mark Taylor, the former Australian captain and longtime New South Wales and Cricket Australia board director, raised alarms about what he perceived to be a lack of batting talent coming through in the nation’s most populous state. “It would mean our Test side just won’t be as good, there’s no doubt about that,” Taylor told the . “The way the numbers in Australia stack up, it’s the responsibility of the two big states to produce their share. If they don’t, chances are Australian cricket will struggle.”Based on the look of the batting order selected for a humiliating Shield defeat to Tasmania, in which the Blues were shot out for 32, Taylor might have had some valid queries: of the top seven, only the recently recalled Jason Sangha was under the age of 25, and none of Daniel Hughes (32), Nick Larkin (30), Daniel Solway (25) or captain Peter Nevill (35) were anywhere near Australian calculations. Of the group, only Kurtis Patterson could realistically have ambitions for the Test team, and faint ones at that based on recent returns.Related

NSW make batting changes after 32 all out

How is a drawn Sheffield Shield final decided?

Queensland and NSW: route to the Sheffield Shield final

Swepson emulating Warne and challenging Lyon

Taylor’s assertions were met with an unusual level of umbrage from within the state system, not so much for what he had observed at Shield level but for what has been steadily bubbling underneath. There is a wellspring of batting promise among young cricketers in New South Wales, the counter-argument went, they just haven’t been picked yet.Perhaps, then, the Tasmanian humiliation and Taylor’s response were necessary evils for the Blues. As much as Larkin and Solway had earned their chances through steady accumulation at grade level, they also struggled to become consistently high scorers for their state, something that Hughes had at least managed to achieve. At the same time, Nevill’s decision to withdraw from the remainder of the Shield to be present for the birth of his first child, and Moises Henriques’ IPL deal, created additional spots for youth.

The young Blues batters will take the field in the knowledge that the bowling attack alongside them, likely to feature Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, Trent Copeland and Sean Abbott, is extremely well versed at pressuring opponents with the benefit of runs on the board

The New South Wales selectors had already shown some degree of interest in the future arc of the national team by elevating Pat Cummins to the domestic limited-overs captaincy ahead of Smith. It was a call effectively indicating their preference for who they would like to see named national captain whenever the time comes for Tim Paine to surrender his post – most likely after next summer’s Ashes series, as commentary roles and the release of a memoir await him.At the same time, the Tasmania defeat forced a pivot to a far more less experienced batting line-up for the final Shield game against Queensland with a place in the final still to secure. Out went Larkin, Solway and Nevill; in came Matthew Gilkes, Jack Edwards, Lachlan Hearne and Baxter Holt as wicketkeeper. Of this group, Edwards (to turn 21 on the final day of the final) has already been heavily invested in, while Hearne (20) and Holt (21) have been growing ever more impatient for chances to show their wares.In Wollongong, Gilkes, Edwards, Hearne and Holt all showed signs of promise, while Sangha responded to greater seniority in the line-up by composing arguably the best century of his young career. The Blues might still have faded to defeat at the hands of Mitchell Swepson if not for a rain-ruined final day of the game, but they at least go into the competition decider with a few more first-innings runs behind them against essentially the same bowling attack they must face again.The new breed: Jack Edwards, Lachlan Hearne, Jason Sangha•Getty ImagesIn between Shield games, of course, 20-year-old Edwards sculpted a century of his own on the domestic limited-overs final at Bankstown to guide the Blues to a 12th one-day title, and will now hope to emulate the feat in the long-form final. The young Blues batters will take the field in the knowledge that the bowling attack alongside them, likely to feature Mitchell Starc, Josh Hazlewood, Nathan Lyon, Trent Copeland and Sean Abbott, is extremely well versed at pressuring opponents with the benefit of runs on the board.Queensland have much the more travelled batting line-up of the two sides, featuring no less than four Test players in Joe Burns, Marnus Labuschagne, Matt Renshaw and the captain Usman Khawaja. But it is the performances of young bats in Shield finals that the selectors will be looking most keenly for – think of Justin Langer in 1992, Michael Bevan in 1994, Adam Gilchrist in 1996 or Andrew Symonds and Simon Katich in 1999, all preludes to substantial international careers.”We’ve got so much talent in our batting ranks, so pleasing to see Jack do what he did the other day, to see the way Matt Gilkes and Jason Sangha played the last Shield game against these guys,” Patterson said. “That’ll give them the world of confidence going into this game. It’s certainly on myself and Dan Hughes as the two older guys in the group to make sure we do our part and play our roles, but while those other guys are young, most of them have enough experience now and they’ve got a lot of confidence in their games.”So the balance of the New South Wales side for the Shield final might have been a case of circumstances as much as design, but it has at least provided the game’s decision-makers with some new talents to assess on the biggest stage short of a Test match. It has also followed, if loosely, the formula of those drought-breaking Chicago Cubs.

Heather Knight: 'The first time I was at Lord's they had giant prawns on the table'

The England women’s captain on her love for seafood, the best cook in the team, and the Vietnamese salad recipe she won’t share

As told to Alan Gardner14-Jul-2021What is your favourite meal to go to week in, week out?
I love Japanese food, so whenever we’re on tour, I’ll try and get out for some Japanese if I can. I’m not great at cooking sushi, so it has to be Deliveroo or a meal out.What is your speciality in the kitchen?
It sounds rubbish but I make a really good Vietnamese noodle salad. Loads of fresh veg, noodles, and it’s all in the dressing – the dressing is key, but I can’t reveal my ingredients, I’m afraid. Then you can add whatever protein you want.Is that a closely guarded Knight family recipe handed down through the ages?
I’m not sure my parents have ever tried Vietnamese food, to be honest! No, it’s something I’ve picked up out in Australia – they like their Vietnamese over there. I’ve adapted it slightly.Which cricket venue has the best catering?
Definitely Lord’s. You get a choice of a three-course meal, and the first time I was there as a player they had giant prawns on the table. I love seafood, so I was sold.Which of your team-mates is the best cook?
Jenny Gunn is very good. She’d be up there.What do you recommend from the Gunn menu?
She has a very good scallop dish. She loves seafood, like I do, and she’s very good at making scallops and pancetta.Anything you always take on tour?
Coffee, at the moment. Especially with bubble life, you can’t go out and get a decent coffee. So I’ve got my coffee machine and beans from a local roastery in Bristol.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Heather Knight (@heatherknight55)

You’ve seen , the Australia documentary. Who’s the coffee hipster in the England dressing room?
It’s not quite to that level, but Georgia Elwiss is a bit of a coffee snob and wants to open her own coffee shop when she finishes. She was opening the café for a couple of hours every day in the bubble – it was more of a tuck shop, a roomful of treats as well. Not quite the Love Café but a very good one. A coffee hipster from Wolverhampton.What sort of fast food is it okay to eat as a professional sportsperson?
I’m not sure any’s okay, maybe something less fried. Definitely not chicken nuggets, which are a personal favourite.What would you eat on your cheat day?
I do quite like a good sourdough pizza. Not allowed by our nutritionist very often, but as a cheat meal, that’s fine.Favourite post-workout snack/smoothie?
It’s pretty boring – I quite like a vanilla ice cream flavoured protein powder. With proper milk. I don’t like them with water, they taste like… well, I won’t say what it tastes like. But it’s a lot nicer with milk.Anything you’ve added to or removed from your diet?
Not really, but I’m a massive fan of this chocolate oat milk. It’s not because I’m vegan or lactose intolerant, but it’s absolutely delicious. It’s vegan, so it must be okay for you.

England's fight fails to mask their failings with bat and ball

Root admits his attack bowled too short and that mistakes were repeated

Andrew Miller20-Dec-2021In the end, England found the will to fight, and dragged the Adelaide Test kicking and screaming into the floodlit session of the fifth and final day. But for all that their 113.1 overs of resistance encouraged a few fleeting thoughts of survival, their all-out total of 192 told a more realistic tale.Not only was it the lowest total of the match, and fewer runs even than England’s eventual margin of defeat, it was also the 11th time in 27 innings this calendar year that England had been bowled out for less than 200.It’s an extraordinary collective failing, especially when you consider that Joe Root, England’s captain, has twice made more runs than that in a single innings this year, en route to his stellar haul of 1630 at 62.69.But with the Boxing Day Test looming in six days’ time, and England already 2-0 down in the Ashes having lost in Australia for the 11th time in 12 matches, Root knows that the lessons of these opening two Tests must be absorbed urgently if they are to avoid this tour heading in the same bleak direction as each of its two predecessors.Related

Chris Silverwood insists he's 'right man for the job' as Ashes pressure mounts

Australia reassert age-old dominance of England at home

Hazlewood returns for last three Tests, Cummins available for Melbourne

Joe Root's prove the toughest nuts to crack as Australia close in

“I’m actually very proud of the way that the guys fought today,” Root insisted. “The attitude, the desire – that’s how we need to go about whole Test matches. You can’t just leave it to the last day and expect to pull off an enormous feat, which is what it would have been today.”After the agonies, literal and otherwise, of his final-over dismissal on the fourth evening, Root was particularly pleased for Jos Buttler, England’s embattled wicketkeeper, whose glaring errors behind the stumps had been compounded by his duck in the first innings.Buttler avoided a pair on the final day when his counterpart, Alex Carey, blemished an otherwise superb display by failing to react to an early edge off Mitchell Starc, but seized on that let-off with a doughty 26 from 207 balls – the second-longest innings of his career, behind his century against Pakistan in 2020.”Jos’s innings was outstanding,” Root said, “ably supported by others, Woakesy [Chris Woakes] in particular. But ultimately that is the attitude and the mentality that we have to harness for five days if we’re going to win here.”The disappointing thing about this week is that we made the same mistakes as last week,” Root added. “We just can’t afford to do that. That’s going to be the most frustrating thing about this game, looking back.”Buttler’s innings ended in bizarre fashion, as he stepped back to steer Jhye Richardson into the covers and trod on his own wicket, 12 balls into the final session of the game. And while Root admitted that the team had been “devastated for him” after such a committed effort, he said that the strength of character Buttler had shown was reminiscent of his crucial half-century in the 2019 World Cup final – the sort of big-game mentality for which he had been recalled to the Test team in the first place.”Anyone that can handle a World Cup final – read the situation of the game, and be as composed as he was throughout that – can manage situations like this one within a Test match,” Root said. “He should gain a huge amount of confidence from the way he played today, not just in performing out here in these conditions but in his defence. Hopefully he can take a lot from this into the rest of this series.”Joe Root reflects on another heavy defeat•PA Images via Getty ImagesWhile England’s batting was a recognised concern coming into this Test, Root acknowledged that the bowling had been every bit as culpable in Australia’s first innings. Despite reuniting England’s senior seamers James Anderson and Stuart Broad with a view to exploiting the purported movement of the pink ball, the lengths from all of England’s five quicks were consistently too short to target Australia’s outside edges, as they racked up a formidable 473 for 9 declared.”We need to be braver, and we need to get the ball up there,” Root said. “We were a little bit short with the ball. We didn’t challenge them enough, and they left very well again, which was something that they did in Brisbane as well.”Having witnessed Australia’s success with a fuller length in their own first innings of 236, England’s quicks fared better second time around, particularly on the fourth morning when three wickets tumbled in the first hour. “That’s almost the benchmark for us,” Root said. “We need to look at those passages of play, and do them for longer, and exploit the conditions as well as we did in that period of the game.”Overall, however, England were outbatted, outbowled, and outfielded on a consistent basis from the first ball to last.”That’s the game,” Root said. “You have to be able to put the ball in the right areas for long enough, you have to be able to score big runs, and when you create those chances you have to take them.”I think the frustration within our dressing room is that we did not quite execute very basic things well enough for the second game in a row. First of all, we need to learn, and we need to learn fast. We can’t make the same mistakes that we have done so far.”Despite the 2-0 scoreline, and the knowledge that no England team has ever fought back from such a deficit to win the Ashes, Root remained adamant that all is not lost, and that the gulf between the teams need not be as big as it has seemed in the first two Tests.”With the bat, we have got the ability,” he said. “I don’t think that Australia are that much better than us in these conditions. We are better than how we’ve played and we’ll front up in Melbourne, and put in a performance which is a fairer reflection of the ability in our dressing-room.”We’ve got three massive games with the Ashes on the line now. And if that’s not motivation enough to go there and put performances in, I don’t know what is.”

The king is 70, long live the king

Viv Richards, lion in winter, talks T20 and whether he wishes he was playing in the modern era

Osman Samiuddin16-Mar-20220:59

‘If T20 was around when we were, why not go and have some professional fun’

Last week, as we mourned the tragic loss of one of the game’s greats, so passed a significant life moment for another. Sir Viv Richards, who played his last Test five months before Shane Warne played his first, is now 70 years old.Or, as he is quick to point out, “70 years young”.It’s a bit of a dad-quip but are you not going to laugh when Viv Richards laughs, satisfied with the funny he’s made? We’re talking, as we do now, via Zoom, and Richards, proudly of Antigua, is sitting in a hotel room in Lahore, as a “mentor” for Quetta Gladiators in the Pakistan Super League, talking into a smartphone. This is a very 21st-century scene, although Richards, and those shoulders, bring a magisterial touch to the framing.Related

'The first thing is to think aggression' (2015)

Mark Nicholas: The King and I (2019)

The long, hot summer of Viv Richards (2016)

A symbol of West Indian supremacy

Nowadays this commitment is his most active involvement in the game. And while a T20 franchise mentor is totally the same energy as a company’s Chief Happiness Officer, somehow Richards’ role at Quetta has not only appeared organic, it has also been substantive.His presence in the dugout at PSL games has often been the game to watch. Even now, there’s little doubt he is – was – an athlete, the vibe he always brought, that there is nothing more serious in his life than that to which he is presently deployed. He chest-bumps, he fist-pumps, he high-fives, he grooves. In the first PSL, when Quetta reached the final, he charged on to the field to celebrate, with the same conviction with which he once celebrated a Rob Bailey dismissal. That was five years go, but he’s still so clearly into each moment of a game, you can’t help but wonder: 30 years from his last game, how much is he missing it?”Not really,” he says. “What I’m seeing is a lot of individuals who have done the game in itself proud. The magnificent players that you’ve seen, certainly the game has improved somewhat. The bats, the power-hitting, you know, most certainly the T20 stuff wasn’t around when we were playing.”With old chum Ian Botham at the unveiling of the trophy named after the two of them earlier this month in North Sound, Antigua•Gareth Copley/AFP/Getty ImagesSurely, though, there have been times where you’ve sized up some poor bowler, clocked the boundary sizes, felt the heft of that bat and thought: pad me up now?”Well, yes, I would say this, that sometimes there is a little urge… why the hell didn’t T20 come a little earlier, you know?” There’s a little shimmying of those shoulders as he says this, just one of the physical manifestations of that gold-dust swagger.”One of the things I am pleased and very happy for is that the pioneers that graced the field over the years, they would’ve set the foundation for what’s happening today. I’m just hoping that the individuals who are playing today and earning whatever, appreciate the fact that there were pioneers before who obviously led the way for what’s happening today.”A wider theme can be parsed from these lines, in which, broadly speaking, the supremacy of red-ball cricket is paramount. T20s cannot be the judge of a cricketer, Richards says. Red-ball remains “the real baptism where cricket is concerned”. Boundaries are too small. If helmets weren’t around, neither would modern batting’s derring-do be. “Suits of armour” makes an appearance, and he frets players are too readily forsaking national teams for franchises. In referring to T20s as “professional fun”, moreover, he fairly harrumphs “professional”, as might a man from a time when being a professional cricketer was not inevitable.This is a generational cleft, although it doesn’t come across as bitter as much as it does cautionary. It is to say that a world existed before yesterday, that people strived hard in it; in it people failed and excelled, in it people innovated, in it there were greats who were shaped by the circumstances of their time. It is to say that as we move ahead, we can only do so by remaining mindful of where we are coming from. Which is no bad plea.And he kind of have a point about bowlers in T20s.Richards obliges with selfies and autographs at the West Indies-Pakistan game in the 2019 World Cup•Gareth Copley/ICC/Getty Images”What I would say is that there are times when I think bowlers are taken advantage of.” He pauses, then laughs at the words that are about to come: “And I say that mildly.”You know, when you look at some of these T20 tournaments, you see the small boundaries, these huge hitters, the improvement in the bats, you know, as a batsman I shouldn’t be saying this, but I believe that the bowlers sometimes have been taken for granted. Especially when you have batters making mistakes, top-edging stuff for sixes. I believe the boundary sometimes could be a little bit bigger. Just making the playing field on the whole much more enjoyable for everyone to participate and compete.”When asked what his one wish for the game would be, he asks for bigger boundaries. It is hardly a radical manifesto, but this note of sympathy from a batter who displayed little of it to bowlers when playing adds a little gravitas.That had everything to do with the bowlers he came across, the Lillees and Thommos, the Imrans and Hadlees, as well as his own team-mates. The one thing he couldn’t dare give them was sympathy.We are currently passing through an era that might, in time, be remembered even more favourably for fast bowling. Richards watched the Ashes – it is not clear why – and, unsurprisingly, liked what he saw from the hosts.”When I looked at Australia, I felt that was the perfect example. You have four guys coming at you all day and you’ve got to survive that, your technique on the line. Testing times. The leaving of deliveries outside off stump. The concentration factor.I and I: Richards holds up a portrait of him by artist Brandon Kelly•Randy Brooks/AFP/Getty Images”Yes, you look at even Shaheen [Shah Afridi], he has come on in leaps and bounds. Ever since I’ve been coming here to Pakistan, this is one of the things I have noted – the finds in terms of fast bowlers. Guys are clicking at 145-150kph on a regular basis, which means that it is healthy in that category.”As I said, some of the things that have not changed, in my opinion, is proper fast bowling. I could call on a few from yesterday, you know, who were fine exponents. I could give you four who I played with. And the count could go on and on. But in a big way, I believe that never changes.”The fastest bowler he says he faced was Jeff Thomson, which is not surprising. The fastest ball he ever faced is, but also isn’t: a bouncer from Wasim Akram in an ODI in Hobart in late 1988. It could be recency bias of one kind – on the morning of this interview, Richards had inducted Akram into the PCB’s hall of fame. But everyone knows that though Akram operated as a sculptor, he could be a wrecking ball when the mood gripped him.”One of the quickest deliveries I have ever, ever encountered, and I believe there was someone upstairs looking after me,” he recalls. “I had some hair left then, somewhat of a mini-Afro and this one went by so quickly, I could hear it hitting the wicketkeeper’s gloves and I said, ‘Wow, wow.’ Wasim was a young man, coming on to the scene, and I was heading towards the exit door so I was glad that while he was coming then, I was going.”I can remember also that I did say to the individuals, the batsmen in the West Indies team at the time, I said, ‘Hey man, good luck to you guys, having to encounter that guy on a regular basis man.’ Wasim, he was very, very special. Up to this day, I still see that particular delivery. I have nightmares about it every now and again.”It is from a great contemporary of Richards’ that we have heard on racism over the last couple of years, since the murder of George Floyd and the rise of the Black Lives Matter movement. Michael Holding has become a prominent and powerful voice on racism. For those who followed the great West Indies sides of that era, it might seem an unexpected development; even Holding himself admitted in 2020 that Richards was more politically active than he was during their playing days.Second life: Richards is probably found more often on golf courses than at cricket grounds these days•Hannah Peters/Getty ImagesThere would appear to be no specific reason why we have not heard Richards as much. It could be visibility – the pandemic has meant that the first time he travelled outside the Caribbean in recent years was for the T20 World Cup last year. It’s definitely not because he has suddenly not been subject to racist behaviour anymore. In fact, he was, as recently as when returning from the T20 World Cup, on a flight in the Caribbean. It should be getting better, he says, but it isn’t.And he is exactly as you imagine he might be on the issue.”Well, what I know for sure is, the way it should be is that all lives should matter. You know, that’s the way I look at it. All lives should matter. But in some cases, take, for instance, America, the racism we have seen on a regular basis, innocent folks being gunned down by the police, it doesn’t seem like that is the case.”So this is why I will always be an advocate in a big way. Why is it that it just keeps happening to this particular colour?” He points to his forearm. “Because I myself have gone through that sort of stuff, the racism, at some point. I’m a pretty conscious guy. I’ve always believed in my colour, my race. And anyone, in my opinion, who wants to shoot you down, to stamp on you because of your colour, he doesn’t have a divine right to do that.”This is why I would always believe in the Malcolm X factor: by any means necessary, if you need to survive some of the thinking of individuals around the world, like the National Front, the Klan. I’m for anyone of this colour, whoever is being persecuted, whoever is facing race issues, anyone on this earth who is going to say to me as a human being that I haven’t got any right to survive because of my colour – wow, I will do what it takes, what is necessary, in order to survive.”The only sour note, really, is that we’ve lost Richards to golf. That’s how he now spends his days, hanging on courses with Richie Richardson and Eldine Baptiste. Playing a fair bit too, as a handicap of seven indicates. Not bad, he says, for a 70-year-old.

Andrew Symonds, a player who came from the future

If they had T20 in 1998 and not 2008, Jarrod Kimber wonders, what on earth could he have done?

Jarrod Kimber15-May-2022Andrew Symonds fielded differently to others. He was a ring-fielding predator. Proactive, with otherworldly athletic gifts, he was like an oppressive force at cover.One game towards the end of his career he was mic’ed up and he took people through his methods. And you saw how his mind, body and desire came together to make him one of the world’s best inside the circle.Related

Roy 388: Townsville pays tribute to Andrew Symonds

Andrew Symonds dies in car accident aged 46

'This really hurts'

Seven innings that defined Andrew Symonds' career

Ricky Ponting: Andrew Symonds 'an extraordinary player and even better human being'

The first bit was how much he actually wanted the ball because he believed through that he could keep himself in the game. For all his technical and physical gifts, this was the most important one. He was desperate to be involved. Some players don’t want the ball; Symonds needed it.Then there was the physical prowess. He could change direction like someone far smaller. He was swift across the ground and had a rocket arm. Australia turned Mike Young, an American baseball coach, into a fielding specialist, and paired him with Symonds, which took his fielding to another level. For years when he talked about his fielding, Young’s name would often come up.And then there was his brain. That is what you saw in this on-field masterclass. He was talking about bat faces, areas batters wanted to score in, and his own intuition. You can be the fastest fielder in the world, but it doesn’t help if you are waiting for the ball to be hit. Symonds would read the bowler and batter and proactively stop runs.And in that way, and almost every other way, he was always ahead of the game.If they had T20 in ’98, not ’08, what on earth could he have done?•PA Photos/Getty ImagesOne of the big technical changes that he made as a batter was to stop trying to hit every ball as hard as he could. The reasoning was that because he hit the ball so hard naturally, a swing at three-quarters power, off the middle of his bat, could clear the boundary anyway.In the era of ODI cricket Symonds played, the average strike rate was 74, and a six was hit every 109 balls. His strike rate was 92.5 and he hit a six every 53 balls. Despite retiring before ODI cricket got a lot faster, he still has the 11th-best strike rate of all time of those with more than 5000 runs.But the interesting thing is how much Australia tried to rein all that in. We know how much faster he could have scored if they had ever let him off the leash. He averaged a very respectable 40 in ODIs. But what kind of player could Australia have had if they just let Roy be Roy? There are only three players with a career strike rate of over 100 with that amount of runs: Shahid Afridi, Virender Sehwag and AB de Villiers. Symonds held himself back to a strike rate of 92 and an average of 40 and he won twice the number of World Cups as that trio combined, as well as a Champions Trophy. Across two World Cups and two Champions Trophies, he averaged 76 at a strike rate of 95. But what could his ceiling have been had he been truly let loose?The game was different then. The free market wasn’t dictating what you did, and so Symonds had to conform to what Australia wanted. But ultimately you couldn’t really make him a normal cricketer because it wasn’t how he thought. And so with his bowling, Symonds was two bowlers depending on how he felt and what the team needed.He wasn’t the first allrounder to bowl pace and spin, but he was perhaps one of the first to do it slightly more tactically. Symonds’ offspin was very much like the canny part-timers you get in club cricket. It came from a powerful arm, and it wasn’t about spin, it was about accuracy and intelligence, and he bowled the ball where he felt it was hardest to hit boundaries from. His medium pace could wobble the ball around and, occasionally, get a bit more out of the deck than others. Neither were frontline skills on their own, but he made them work when he needed to. He was a match-ups bowler before the term existed in cricket. Without being a full-time fifth bowler for Australia in ODIs – they often split his overs between him and Darren Lehmann or Michael Clarke – he still took 133 wickets at 37.By 2016, when T20s had changed the game, quite a few coaches stopped using the term allrounder as much. Instead, they used something from baseball, referring to a player as a two- or three-tool player: bats, bowls, and fields. Symonds was so far ahead of his time he was a four-tool player: bat, bowl offspin, bowl medium, and field.Over 26 Tests, Symonds showed he had the game for red-ball cricket too•AFPAnd we did see just the smallest amount of what he could have done in the format of cricket that best suited his skills. In 2003 he played five T20 matches for Kent, scoring 170 runs off 75 balls. In fact, over his first 16 games at the back-end of his peak, he made 529 runs from 260 balls while averaging 44. Sadly, the IPL came just after his peak, but he made a hundred in his first year, and over the first two seasons averaged 45.5 while striking at 150.He got two more years, but one was his 2011 campaign, in which he struck at 97 over 11 matches. He was still playing because he still had so many useful skills. But he was gone as a batter then. Yet his career numbers still look incredible, averaging 32 with a strike rate of 147. It is a badly drawn picture of what peak Symonds could have been. If they had T20 in ’98, not ’08, what on earth could he have done? It’s just sad for him that he was a T20 player before there really was T20. He showed people how to play it and then had to watch others do it.You can see patterns among the great white-ball players linking different eras. Javed Miandad led into Dean Jones who became Ricky Ponting, and then we had Virat Kohli. Michael Bevan had MS Dhoni follow him. Viv Richards’ closest copy is AB de Villiers. Symonds was really very much like Kieron Pollard, a power player with a brain, one who broke chases and bowlers early on, with a freedom that other batters found unnerving. And he continued to bother people with bowling, whatever he could to be effective, and incredible fielding efforts.Symonds wasn’t just some white-ball wizard either; remember he played 26 Tests in a solid era of Australian cricket, often keeping Shane Watson out of the team. And in those matches he averaged 40.5 with the bat while also adding almost one wicket every game with whatever bowling he thought would work best. In a 14-year first-class career Symonds hit 40 hundreds.He was often wrongly perceived as a slogger, because he was so different. But he was more than that. He was exciting, unique and powerful. He was a player who came from the future. For crowds in the 90s, used to batters pushing the ball around in the middle overs, one-dimensional bowlers and fielders who reacted to the ball, he was thrilling. And we didn’t always know how to process that.Watching him bat was always a bittersweet experience because the thrill was in him pushing too hard, but the fear was that would get him out. And the feeling that no matter what he did on the field, it would always end too soon. Today, I feel that again, only it’s far worse.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus