All posts by n8rngtd.top

Omar's stickability, Enamul's guile

From Javed Omar to Enamul Haque jnr, players skilled in the longer format have for long been treated condescendingly by a country that has grown up on a diet of one-day cricket. But the value they brought to Bangladesh’s Test team is undeniable

Mohammad Isam13-Mar-2017Athar Ali Khan oozed style, in game as much as appearance. Tall and immaculately dressed in an ironed white shirt and his trademark wide-brimmed hat, Athar’s defensive push had everything in place, with the front foot protruding and the elbow high. Javed Omar, who appeared to jump while playing his version of the stroke, made for quite the contrast. Where Athar played a proper shot, Omar’s was more a stop.Athar was admired during his career, though in key moments – such as the ICC Trophy final in 1997 – he wasn’t asked to bat as Bangladesh needed quick runs. Omar was appreciated at least a decade into his international career. He wasn’t understood, he felt. Both were called “Test” cricketers, but in Omar’s case, it was as if he was being mocked for his inability to score quick runs. He was no Minhajul Abedin, Akram Khan or Aminul Islam.Not much has changed since in the life of a Bangladesh Test cricketer, especially the ones that don’t play much beyond the the long format. Mominul Haque, despite all his skills with the bat, only plays a few times a year, and has to perform constantly. Mehedi Hasan and Taijul Islam are his latest “Test-only” partners, while others like Robiul Islam and Enamul Haque jnr are now on the scrap-heap.It is interesting to note how batsmen with a comparatively better defensive technique and willingness to open the innings and bowlers with the rare quality of bowling well for long spells have been looked at condescendingly for most of their careers. A lot of it has to do with how Bangladeshis grew up on one-day cricket, and even Test status didn’t change that outlook.It wasn’t so for an earlier generation. Former Bangladesh captain Raqibul Hasan came close to making the Pakistan Test side in the late 1960s. He was an opening batsman of much promise in Dhaka’s domestic circuit, but was mostly ignored by selectors who sided with players from West Pakistan. According to senior journalist Arifur Rahman Babu, Raqibul was one of the few cricketers from this region who merited a place in the Pakistan Test team. But he also tells the story of Asaduzzaman Misha, who played for Bangladesh as an opener in the late 1970s.”Dr Misha used to be a solid opener during those days when others like Yousuf Rahman were more dashing batsmen,” Babu says. “Among those who watched league matches, he was sometimes regarded as someone quite solid, who could have been a Test opener.”As the Dhaka Premier League one-day competition gained importance and popularity, so did the need for free-scoring batsmen. Athar broke into the Bangladesh team during the 1986 ICC Trophy, and made his ODI debut two years later. When he became a regular opener, starting from the 1994 ICC Trophy, his classic technique, patience and strokeplay made him look like a Test opener, and made him stand out among many from his generation.”I wasn’t lucky enough to play Test cricket, but it was always a dream,” Athar says. “I started my Bangladesh career as a lower-order batsman. I had opened in the 1986 ICC Trophy, but only became a regular when, in 1994, [the then Bangladesh coach] Mohinder Amarnath told me that I was good enough to open the batting again. He said I had the technique to play fast bowling.”The first idea was to keep playing in the V, by presenting the full face of the bat. I tried to watch the moving ball as close as possible, and leave it to the keeper if it is not as close to the off-stump. I was happy to open the innings for Bangladesh.”The first time Athar opened in ODIs was with Omar during the 1995 Asia Cup. At the start of his career, Omar looked like someone who needed to work very hard to stay abreast of his more talented teammates. For the next five years, he was only brought back after other openers had failed.For kids in the 1990s, anyone batting slowly or even defending a ball was trying to be “a Javed Omar”. He was one of the most misunderstood cricketers of his generation. There weren’t many Omar fans, because his style of batting didn’t suit what Bangladeshis saw and played at the time – one-day matches. But, while he was ridiculed for batting slowly, his stop-start international career ran into some good news: Bangladesh were given Test status in 2000. There was no doubt that Omar would go on to play Tests.Enamul Haque jnr bowled Bangladesh to their maiden Test match and series win, but the presence of Mohammad Rafique and Abdur Razzak in the ODI team denied him short-format opportunities•AFPOn his Test debut, against Zimbabwe in April 2001, he carried his bat through the second innings. Omar would play 40 Tests until July 2007, a period during which he was among only four cricketers who were Test regulars. Through trial and error, he learned to leave deliveries that would tempt him to drive, and once he had mastered the technique, he survived for long.He averaged 22.05 with a century and eight fifties, but regards a rearguard 43 against Zimbabwe in the 2005 Test at the Bangabandhu National Stadium as his most rewarding innings. Until AB de Villiers made 43 off 297 balls over 354 minutes against India in December 2015, Omar’s 43 was the slowest sub-50 innings in Test history in terms of balls faced (258) and minutes spent at the crease (340).”I made 43 having batted for more than five hours to ensure the second Test in 2005 was drawn, and which enabled us to win our maiden Test series,” Omar says. “There were lots of scoring opportunities on a really flat wicket that day, but I played that way so that no one could complain that I didn’t live up to my Test specialist tag that day. It is one of the slowest 43s of all time and an innings that still makes me proud.”For years, Omar was the subject of jokes about his batting, arising out of a failure to notice how effective he was for Bangladesh, whose overall aggressive approach to Test batting didn’t pay too much dividend.”I could survive a long time at the wicket, though I suffered for it at the time because people teased me for batting slowly. But I really feel proud now when people tell me that I was a genuine Test player.”There wasn’t much he could base his work on, as long-form cricket only became regular in the domestic scene in 1999. “I had to make many technical adjustments. Our first-class level in the early days was picnic cricket,” he says. “When we went to New Zealand to play first-class matches in 1997, it was an eye-opener for us. And we had virtually no idea what Test cricket was all about in those days.”Once batsmen like Tamim Iqbal emerged through ODIs, Bangladesh once again ditched Omar in mid-2007, and this time for good.But for years till then, Bangladesh’s ODI and Test XIs looked similar with only a few changes in personnel. One of the first players to be labelled a Test specialist was Enamul, who, in his third Test series, took 18 wickets in two matches to destroy a new-look Zimbabwe. It was pivotal to Bangladesh’s first series win, much like Omar’s effort on the final day of that 2005 series.With Mohammad Rafique playing both formats and Abdur Razzak also emerging as an ODI specialist, Enamul’s left-arm spin began to be considered only for Tests. He was picking up wickets by the bagful in first-class and A team cricket, but they dried up at the international level, as did Bangladesh’s Test schedule. After 2009, he had almost permanently lost his Test spot, only returning for a solitary match against Zimbabwe in 2013 when he bowled at a much quicker pace.In that same series, a Bangladesh fast bowler won a Man-of-the-Series award for the first time. Robiul, who bowled classic outswing, had slowly developed the one that darted back in, and troubled Zimbabwe. He bowled 110 overs, the most by a Bangladesh fast bowler in a Test series, and most of his 15 wickets were brilliant to watch.Robiul was living his childhood dream, which was slightly different from that of many cricketers of his generation, who tended to want to bat or bowl spin: “I wanted to be Bangladesh’s No. 1 Test bowler.”Growing up in Satkhira, he saw the Abahani-Mohammedan league derby on TV and was instantly attracted to the players’ whites. Soon, he realised all cricket was played in whites, and once he entered professional cricket through the first-class system, his love for the whites became ingrained into his system.”I was just mad about Test cricket,” he says. “Coincidentally, I also started my cricket career at the top level with first-class cricket, so the two got connected. I developed a habit of bowling long spells and had a lot of fun working out batsmen. I was always too focused about Tests, more than one-dayers, which is why maybe I was good in it and then got only considered for Tests.”A leg injury after his epic performance against Zimbabwe and a dislocated shoulder the following year pushed him out of contention. Now, he doesn’t find a regular place in domestic first-class cricket either. But he is a hard trier, and has been for more than a decade in some of the toughest conditions for seamers.Robiul Islam was the first Bangladesh fast bowler to win a Player-of-the-Series award in Test cricket•Associated PressEnamul and Robiul are early examples of how players with the “Test specialists” tag suffered due to confinement to a single format. In the last five years, it has been predominantly bowlers who have been given Test-only tags – Taijul, Mohammad Shahid, Jubair Hossain and now Mehedi.Left-arm spinner Taijul, who took a hat-trick on ODI debut, and legspinner Jubair have at least been tried a few times in shorter formats, but Shahid and Mehedi are yet to be considered for anything but Tests. Taijul has made steady contributions, but Jubair has lost his place.Mehedi could still make the limited overs team, given the value he adds with his batting and fielding, but Mominul, who started so well batting at No. 4 in Tests, has been asked to move to No. 3 and focus on it permanently. While it is a move that Bangladesh feel will enable their most talented Test batsman to concentrate on a tough job, what Mominul feels is also important and must be considered. He hadn’t done too badly in ODIs, but hasn’t played one since the 2015 World Cup.During the New Zealand tour of 2016-17, he sat around for nearly three weeks before getting to play Tests. It is to his credit that he performs quite consistently. How his or even Mehedi’s recent drop in form in Tests is seen is going to be critical. If they are not given a longer rope, they could disappear quickly, and replacing such talented cricketers takes a long time.But without these specialists, Bangladesh’s Test team will be half-cooked, like it was for years when it contained no Javed, Mominul or Robiul.

Who is Faheem Ashraf?

From growing up in Kasur to his exploits in domestic cricket, everything you need to know about Pakistan’s rookie sensation

Umar Farooq30-May-2017Where’s he from?
He was born in Kasur, a city close to the Indian border, and about a 45-minute drive from Lahore. You might know the city for the shrine of Bulleh Shah, the celebrated Sufi poet-saint, and also as the birthplace of Noor Jehan, one of Pakistan’s most famous singers. If he plays for Pakistan, Ashraf could become another reason the city is known for – he would be the first from Kasur to play for Pakistan.Tell me a little about his riseThough Kasur is close to Lahore, for the PCB, the district comes into the Faisalabad region, and this is where Ashraf started his competitive cricket, playing in the inter-district Under-19 competition in 2010. He turned out for Kasur at the time as a fast bowler, picking up 10 wickets in 2010, and 15 in 2011. He was promoted to the Faisalabad Under-19 team and wasn’t able to make a major impact, taking 14 wickets, apart from 117 runs, batting with the tail.So what caught the selectors’ eye?In 2013, at a senior district-level tournament, he became the top wicket-taker for Kasur with 22 wickets at 11.13 and also scored 189 runs with the help of two half-centuries. Those performances won him a ticket to first-class cricket, as he broke into the Faisalabad team for the 2013-14 Quaid-e-Azam Trophy.I see. And how did that go?Pretty good. He hit a hundred on first-class debut against Multan, at a healthy 60-plus strike rate. Since then, he has played 31 first-class matches, scoring 1207 runs at 32.62 – not a bad haul for someone selectors essentially consider a lower-order batsman. Oh, and he’s also picked up 94 wickets at 26.63. His List A numbers are decent, too, though it is with the ball that he has shone in that format: 60 wickets in 38 games, at a strike rate of 28.1.Any other performances I should be able to reel off like I’m a selector?He might not have compiled remarkable numbers, but with Ashraf, the cameos are the ones that are remembered. He scored 44 against WAPDA at a time when his side, HBL, was languishing at 21 for 6 in the final of the Quaid-e-Azam Trophy. Handily, that was in front of the selection committee last year in Karachi, and he has been on their radar since. He made it to the Pakistan ‘A’ team that played against Zimbabwe and England Lions recently, and 19 wickets in the Departmental One-Day Cup – the highest in the tournament – earlier this year meant he was pushing for an international debut.Is he the answer to…
Pakistan’s ongoing, eternal search for an allrounder? Hold your horses just a second and take a reality check. He is, currently, a kind of leader of the tail, batting mostly between Nos. 7, 8 and 9 for his domestic sides. He averages less than 16 in the format he is likely to make his Pakistan debut in. With the ball, he is usually first or second change, unless an especially grassy pitch presents itself, when he has been known to open the bowling. His nine overs in the two warm-up games have gone for 65, without a wicket, so…Still, don’t just take our word for it.
When he was working his way up from district level and onto the first-class scene, the current national selector and former offspinner Tauseef Ahmed was keeping an eye on him. Tauseef had a chance to monitor Ashraf closely in 2015 while at National Bank of Pakistan (he has since moved to Habib Bank). There, Ashraf made some valuable runs with the tail (271 altogether, at 38.71) and picked up 23 wickets. His ability to strike the ball clean and provide regular breakthroughs – in addition to the ferocity and confidence with which he played the hook shot – was something that stuck with Tauseef.”I actually saw him when he was playing for NBP, and his ability to strike the ball was impressive,” Tauseef said. “What else does a team want when a batsman batting with the tail can get a run-rate between 8 and 10 an over? He has great firepower, and I have seen him doing that quite often on the domestic circuit.”

The IPL auction watchlist from TNPL 2017

TNPL 2017 saw some familiar faces have a prolific run, while a few unknown ones made their case for an IPL contract

Gaurav Sundararaman and Srinath Sripath21-Aug-2017Washington Sundar had a dream tournament with both bat and ball•TNPLThe potential multi-millionairesWashington SundarAge: 17
Team: Albert Tuti Patriots
Role: Allrounder – Opening batsman and right-arm offspinner
Skills: Wicket-taking option in the Powerplay and hard-hitting opening batsman
TNPL 2017 stats (9 innings): 459 runs at 76.5; strike-rate of 154.54 and 15 wickets at 12.73; economy rate of 6.16
The unanimous choice for the Player of the Tournament, Washington Sundar held the rare distinction of leading both the batting and bowling charts at one point towards the end of TNPL 2017. He already showed what he could do with the ball during IPL 2017. During this edition of the TNPL, he displayed his batting prowess with consistent scores throughout the tournament, scoring a hundred and smashing the fastest fifty in the tournament’s history, off just 15 balls.Washington finished the tournament as the leading run-getter, with 459 runs at an average of 76.5 and a strike-rate of 154.54. With the ball, he took 15 wickets at an economy rate of 6.16. With Indian allrounders in such high demand, Washington has staked his claim to be one of the top choices at the auction next year.Sai Kishore topped the bowling charts in the second edition of TNPL•TNPLR Sai Kishore
Age: 20
Team: Chepauk Super Gillies
Role: Left-arm orthodox bowler
Skills: Economical bowler with accurate line and length; wicket-taking option with the new ball
TNPL 2017 stats (10 innings): 17 wickets at 13.41; economy rate of 5.70
One of the most consistent players in the TNPL, Sai Kishore topped the wickets charts this edition. He is the only bowler to be among the top five wicket-takers in both seasons so far. Kishore idolises R Ashwin; he also wears jersey number 99. Like Ashwin, Kishore has proven to be a genuine wicket-taking option with the new ball, at a miserly economy rate.In the 2016 edition of the TNPL, Kishore took 12 wickets at an economy rate of 5.64 runs per over from nine innings, and has carried on his form through this season too. Left-arm spinners have always been in demand in the shortest format of the game, making Kishore a vital prospect for teams in the next IPL. Kishore has already made his Tamil Nadu debut earlier this year, finishing as the second-highest wicket-taker in the Deodhar Trophy.TNPLThe other big contenders
B Aparajith
Age: 23
Team: VB Thiruvallur Veerans
Role: Allrounder – Middle-order Batsmen and right-arm offspinner
Skill: Experienced, consistent run-getter
TNPL 2017 stats (7 innings): 277 runs at 46.16; strike-rate of 150.54Baba Aparajith has previously been picked by Chennai Super Kings and Rising Pune Supergiant. A consistent performer in the TNPL who has been among the top five run-getters in both editions so far, Aparajith has been unable to carry his form while playing for his state side Tamil Nadu during domestic tournaments.M Shajahan
Age: 29
Team: Karaikudi Kaalai
Role: Middle-order batsman
Skill: Hitting ability
TNPL 2017 stats (8 innings): 209 runs at 41.80; strike-rate of 145.13
Shajahan is among the cleanest strikers of the ball in the TNPL, with the ability to hit sixes from the outset, a skill in high demand in T20s. Shajahan scored 17 sixes, the second most in the tournament, and managed to hit a six in every innings he batted.Akshay Srinivasan
Age: 23
Team: Lyca Kovai Kings
Role: Middle-order batsman and Right-arm offspinner
Skill: Can play anchor as well as clear the boundary easily
TNPL 2017 stats (5 innings): 125 runs at 31.25; strike-rate of 137.36
Akshay Srinivasan may not have outstanding numbers, but has played some crucial knocks under pressure to take his team to victory. Historically, the need for a good uncapped middle-order batsman has been vital towards maintaining team balance in the IPL. Akshay fits the bill perfectly.Underdogs with an outside chance
While not as consistent or prolific as those in the first two categories, there were a few others who lit up the tournament with exceptional individual performances. Rohith Ravikumar smashed the tournament’s fastest hundred in a chase for Kovai Kings, Antony Dhas played multiple cameos in the middle order, while Mohan Prasath and R Alexander impressed with their left-arm spin.

India's footwork puts Sri Lanka in a spin

While India’s spinners have looked dangerous, Sri Lanka’s have been rendered rather ineffective courtesy the visiting batsmen’s consistent stepping out

Sidharth Monga in Galle27-Jul-20172:29

Agarkar: Sri Lanka looking at Mathews for contribution with both bat and ball

India like to be ruthless when ahead, in that they don’t like to leave the door open in order to make a statement. Even the ever-present threat of rain in Galle is not likely to make them enforce a follow-on on a 10-man Sri Lanka, even if they bowl them out in the first hour on the third morning. Prospects of a three-day finish might not be tempting enough for this team, which has seen the pitch drying out quickly, and which knows from first-hand experience that chasing anything on a quick-drying Galle surface can be treacherous.However, there might be another benefit of this pragmatic approach: put more miles in the legs of Sri Lanka’s spinners. In a three-Test series to be played over three weeks, India have got on top of the Sri Lanka spinners early, and can further push the advantage home. Rangana Herath and Dilruwan Perera have already bowled 70 overs between them, going at more than four an over for just one wicket. The third day could just be the opportunity to beat them further psychologically.Some will argue that this is a process that began on India’s previous tour of Sri Lanka. Since his match-winning spell in Galle last time, Herath – otherwise the world’s premier Test spinner alongside R Ashwin and Ravindra Jadeja – has averaged 56.55 against India, conceding 3.55 an over. This is becoming eerily similar to how Muttiah Muralitharan averaged 65.66 in his last full series against India. He was taken for close to four an over in that series.An example of India’s superiority in handling spin in this Test has been how they have stepped out once every 4.5 balls to Sri Lanka’s spinners, taking 102 runs off 101 such forays. Shikhar Dhawan has added in the sweep to play havoc with their lengths. This, too, is a continuation of how India came back from the Galle defeat last time. Against Herath alone in the last two Tests of the series, India left their crease on 94 occasions for 111 runs.As a comparison, in this Test, Sri Lanka have stepped down against spin once in two overs. Ashwin and Jadeja enjoyed the freedom of settling down into their lengths. Once Ashwin did, getting the ball to do things in the air before turning it, he looked like he might take a wicket every over. Even when Sri Lanka’s batsmen left their crease, they couldn’t quite reach the pitch of the ball, scoring only seven runs off 13 balls, and also losing Upul Tharanga to a sharp run-out by Abhinav Mukund at silly point.To be fair to Sri Lanka, they were staring at 600 on the scoreboard, and the Galle pitch had started to dry out and play a trick or two. However, as Cheteshwar Pujara, who scored 153 and played a part in deflating the Sri Lanka spinners, pointed out, it cannot take away from how both India’s batsmen and spinners have been better in this spin contest. “Ashwin and Jadeja both have been bowling really well even in the last season, and they’ve continued that,” he said. “I think our bowlers, they’ve bowled better lines and lengths, and I think tomorrow onwards, we’ll see a little more turn on this wicket. The pitch is drying up, so there will be more assistance tomorrow onwards.”Presumably not a fan of famous last words, Pujara resisted invoking a psychological edge over the Sri Lanka spinners, but did say that Sri Lanka will now be on the back foot. “When you start off well, it always puts the opposition on the back foot, but when you are playing at the international level, you still expect them to fight back and we wouldn’t take them lightly,” he said. “We would just like to stick to what we want to do and that was the reason of our success in the home season.”Playing against spin, I think as Indian batsmen, we have enough exposure playing in the domestic circuit. That is the reason all our batsmen have been batting well. Even the lower-middle order, someone like Jadeja, Ashwin, Wridhhiman Saha, Hardik [Pandya, who scored a fifty on debut, batting at No. 8] – all of them can bat well; not just against spinners, but since we are talking about spinners, they all bat well against spinners.”These are ominous words for Sri Lanka, but there is also studied caution in Pujara’s mind. He knows anything can happen against spin. Even the Murali they dominated towards the end of his career roused himself one last time to take eight wickets against India to complete the set of 800, in his last Test. India will be aware of the threat Herath and co. can pose if the pitch starts turning viciously, or if they find themselves in a tricky last-innings chase. However, on the kind of surface laid out in Galle, India do seem to have the Sri Lanka spinners’ number.

Friendship, understanding Mumbai's strength – Tendulkar

Sachin Tendulkar recalls some of his fondest memories with Mumbai on the eve of the side’s 500th Ranji Trophy match

Arun Venugopal in Mumbai08-Nov-2017.First outing with the teamWe knew exactly what we wanted to be because when we were playing Under-15, Under-17, we used to watch national players practicing and Ranji Trophy cricketers practicing alongside them. I was selected at the age of 14 to go to Baroda. We travelled by train. My room partner was Suru Nayak, so he was appropriately selected for me to make sure I sleep on time and all that sort of things. As time went by, I grew up. All in all, the experience was overwhelming and as the time went by with all these greats of Indian cricket, I started feeling at home. I didn’t play a single game that year, but I spent time in the dressing room. That made me feel I belonged in Mumbai cricket.Maiden first-class seasonThe north stand was vocal as usual [with] my friends [sitting there]. I would like to thank Kiran Mokashi and Suru Nayak. Whenever the nets were over, they would take me out and ask me to pad up and set fields – silly point, slip, and all possible attacking fields. There were occasions that they would request that Raju Kulkarni and other fast bowlers to come and bowl at me. Without fail, Mokashi and Suru would come and work on my technique. That would give me so much confidence. They would tell me ‘you would need to survive ten minutes’, but the ten minutes would never get over. I would look up and see that the time was past 5, but they would continue bowling to me. That’s why I was well prepared when I played my first game – I was only 15 then. There were guys at the non-striker’s end. Alan [Sippy] was there, Lalu [Lalchand Rajput] was also there. All these guys gave me confidence.Leading the side to a title in 1994-95 after a dry spellOur practice methods, I thought, were good, but they could be bettered. I am of this belief that results invariably follow your preparation, so I focused more on preparations. I remember Arjun was there, the groundsman. There were a lot of groundsmen with whom I would regularly be in touch with me and I would tell them not to cover the wicket. The bowlers should make our life uncomfortable. Salil [Ankola] was there, Abey [Kuruvilla], Paras [Mhambrey], Manish Patel, so the fast-bowling attack was formidable, possibly the best in India. I would tell them ‘make our lives as miserable as you want and fire away bouncers at will.’ I was mentally strong, I felt, and growing up I was told by [Ramakant] Achrekar sir that catches would win you matches. We would take catches every day. We also had that unwritten rule that batsmen should bowl and vice-versa. I enjoyed bowling. Throughout the practice, there was great intensity and we were also great friends. The friendship reflected on the field. When there were difficult times, we had understanding. That was our strength.Favourite Ranji gameIt has to be the semi-finals against Tamil Nadu [in 1999-2000]. I think we were chasing 485 [chasing 486 for the first-innings lead] and Ashok Mankad was our coach. He kept everyone involved. He had a peculiar way of motivating everyone. He would call Vinod [Kambli]’sir’. That was his way of motivating them. A lot of things happened during that game. At one moment, the ball stopped swinging and Robin Singh kept giving it to the umpires and asked for it to be changed. Finally it got changed and the ball started reversing. I stood two feet outside the crease and I knew some message would go across. Hemang Badani told the bowler ” [front, in Tamil] and next ball I stood two feet inside the crease. Whatever he kept telling the bowler something, I would change [my position]. Whenever he said , I would go back and vice-versa. Post-match, I told him, ‘by the way, I understand Tamil’. The match was quite evenly poised at one stage, but not just saving wickets but also scoring runs was critical. I think I was batting with Ramesh Powar. Having practiced with him – this is the beauty of practising together – I knew he always liked hitting the ball. The last man was there, Santosh Saxena, and the first ball was a full toss that struck his pads. I said from the non-striker’s end ‘not out’ and the umpire gave not out. It was a coincidence and nothing more lest the papers say something tomorrow (laughs). There were still about 165 overs to go in the game. As we know Wankhede’s wicket, on the fourth and fifth day the games start moving fast. Ajit [Agarkar] and other bowlers bowled brilliantly and won us the game.

Eight players to watch out for in Ranji Trophy 2018-19

The biggest-ever Ranji Trophy season will be another opportunity for these players to press for higher honours

Shashank Kishore02-Nov-2018Karun Nair
Having spent two months with the Test side in England as a back-up batsman, Karun Nair saw his back-up, Hanuma Vihari, leapfrog him into the XI. Nair is due to captain India A in two first-class matches in New Zealand after which he will be available for Karnataka for the second half of the first-class season. Omission from the Test squad for Australia may just prove to be a blessing for Nair, as he will have a substantial amount of cricket to score the big runs chief selector MSK Prasad wants him to, before he eyes another national comeback.Shubman Gill
Shubman Gill’s big-match temperament and technique to stand up against tough bowling has been lauded by India A and Under-19 coach Rahul Dravid. Glimpses of his ability were seen in IPL 2018 and in England in the summer with India A. On greener tracks during the North Indian winter and in New Zealand, where he will be part of the India A squad across formats, he could press for a case to be fast-tracked into the national set-up, much like his Under-19 captain Prithvi Shaw.

Sanju Samson
Sanju Samson’s story so far has been of talent not being fulfilled. Having been in the first-class scene for six seasons now, Samson hasn’t topped 700 runs in a single season, at a time when players who have amassed 1000-plus runs are struggling to breakthrough. Yet, Samson’s had people watch him bat in awe in the IPL, even as his wicketkeeping remains a work in progress. Having already seen KS Bharat, Rishabh Pant and Ishan Kishan leapfrog him in the pecking order, time is running out for Samson. The 2018-19 season could well be a make-or-break one for him.Vijay Shankar
India’s search for a back-up seam-bowling allrounder to Hardik Pandya continues, with Vijay Shankar still not having done enough to prove he’s the man. The reason isn’t non-performance, but a history of injuries that has had Vijay spend a significant chunk of the last three seasons in rehab at the National Cricket Academy, for a quadriceps injury and hamstring troubles, apart from struggling with knee, shoulder and ankle injuries. Vijay is a technically solid middle-order batsman, and has added pace to his bowling, allaying early concerns that he may be a stop-gap bowler at best. He will have the tour of New Zealand with India A to showcase his long-form credentials as a bowler.Another blockbuster season will make it impossible to ignore Mayank Agarwal’s claims•PTI Mayank Agarwal
What more can Mayank Agarwal do? Two-thousand plus runs in 2017-18, the most-ever in a domestic season in India. Centuries for India A in England, a double-century for India A against South Africa A at home – but he’s still not made it as even the reserve opener for India’s Test series in Australia. The 27-year old Agarwal has more reason than most to feel hard done by. But having set himself up for so long and proven he’s not a one-trick pony, the onus is on him to once again show the selectors that he has the pedigree by making big runs for India A in New Zealand to break the door open again. Even if he doesn’t replicate the dizzying heights of the previous season, Agarwal has set a benchmark. Another good season will mean he’ll be harder to ignore.Navdeep Saini
Navdeep Saini has been knocking on the doors of the national team for a while. He’s been a part of three overseas tours as a net bowler. He’s been an India A regular and even bowled Delhi to the Ranji trophy final last season. On recent form, he might even have an edge over Shardul Thakur, being an out-and-out quick who has learnt to marry pace with accuracy and the ability to reverse the ball on wearing surfaces. His improved fitness and ability to bowl long spells could also work for him, and strong performances in New Zealand and in the second half of the Ranji Trophy could bring him the much-awaited rewards.Tushar Deshpande
Tushar Deshpande broke through after picking up 21 wickets in four Cooch Behar Trophy games. An unexpected call-up to replace Shardul Thakur, hours before Mumbai’s 2016-17 Ranji Trophy opener, earned him a debut in Lahli. Since then, he’s been on the fringes of the Mumbai set-up. Last year, injury to Dhawal Kulkarni and Thakur’s unavailability handed him opportunities to step up. While he did pick up wickets, a no-ball problem affected his rhythm and consistency. Until the start of the 2018-19 first-class season, he had 67 no-balls and 21 wickets. Having been key to Mumbai’s Vijay Hazare Trophy 2018-19 triumph, impressing with his bristling pace and accuracy, the stocky fast bowler has an opportunity to consolidate his position in the Mumbai set-up.Siddharth Desai
He narrowly missed out on being part of India’s Under-19 World Cup squad earlier this year but Siddharth Desai, all of 18 and eligible to play in the next edition in 2020, continues to turn heads with his left-arm spin. In 2017-18, he picked up 29 wickets in five games, including consecutive five-fors in his first two matches. More recently, he was key to India Under-19’s Asia Cup triumph, finishing the tournament as the second-highest wicket-taker. Desai has a classical open-chested action and relies on wickets through dip and turn. He’s begun the new season much like he did in 2017-18, picking up a five-wicket haul against Baroda at the Moti Bagh Stadium in Vadodara.

Toss advantage > home advantage?

India have had a rough year trying to dismiss tails, but how much of a difference did batting first make in Adelaide? Quite significant

Sidharth Monga in Adelaide08-Dec-2018If you have agonised over India coming close and not winning on the tours of South Africa and England this year, you probably watched the Adelaide Oval Test from behind your sofa once India got into Australia’s lower order. All those memories of stubborn lower-order runs would have come storming back with every over a lower-order wicket didn’t fall.How has Virat Kohli fared this year at the toss?•ESPNcricinfo LtdA lot has been written, said and tweeted about India’s ability to dislodge tails. From Cape Town to Birmingham, from Centurion to Southampton, India’s conservative approach against the lower order has been identified by many, including the team management themselves, as the failure to “seize big moments”. Virat Kohli has marvelled at the opposition allrounders’ clear minds and fearless batting.Yet, a lot of this fear might have disregarded something significant but so obvious that it can be lost. All the lower-order resistance against India came with the opposition ahead in the game, not necessarily on balance but on runs, any runs. When Sam Curran began his onslaught at Edgbaston, England were effectively only 100 for 6, but they were not in deficit, and they were going to make India chase something, anything. South Africa’s lower order rallied in Cape Town and Centurion when they were ahead on runs. In Southampton, England might have given up a first-innings lead, but the complexion of the game changed as soon as they drew level again even though they had lost a wicket by then.

Home advantage is arguably bigger than it has ever been in Test cricket, but the advantage from winning the toss and batting first hardly gets analysed that much. Perhaps because the athletes are too proud to talk about luck. However, in Test cricket today, there seems no way back for a side batting second and falling behind or drawing level or even taking an insignificant lead. Not counting beating Zimbabwe, Bangladesh and West Indies, the last time a side batting second won a Test despite falling behind was back in 2015 when New Zealand overturned a 55-run deficit against Sri Lanka in Hamilton. The last time an away side managed this feat – again not in Zimbabwe, Bangladesh or the West Indies – was back in 2008, when South Africa chased down 414 at the WACA Ground.As a comparison, sides batting first are far likelier to overturn a first-innings deficit. New Zealand did it twice in the recently concluded series against Pakistan. England did it against Sri Lanka in Kandy and against India in Southampton. India themselves came back from a deficit in Johannesburg, just as they did against Australia in Bengaluru. The cliché that Test cricket gives you a second chance applies almost exclusively to sides batting first these days; at least in Tests between fairly evenly matches sides at any rate.There has been a clear and consistent dip in the win-loss ratio of sides fielding first in Test cricket. Most of the years, with the odd exception, the ratio hovered between 0.8 and 1.2, but starting 2014, it has been 0.5, 0.48, 0.48, 0.54, and 0.31 in 2018. Hence you really have to question England’s decision to insert India in at Nottingham earlier this year. Hence you also need to be a little sympathetic towards India’s away record in 2018. This is only the second toss they have won in nine. They won the first match (in Johannesburg), and are in a situation where they should back themselves to win the second.

This begs the question if toss advantage – rather bat-first advantage – is more significant than home advantage. Over the same last five years, the win-loss ratio for away sides has been 0.5, 0.6, 0.61, 0.46, and 0.48 in 2018. There isn’t much between the two then. There is reason to believe they might be both just as significant. If you look through that prism, India faced the double whammy of home and toss advantage in seven of their nine away Tests this year. In one of those, England were merciful enough to ask India to bat, an opportunity India cashed in on. The Lord’s insertion was done in freakish conditions, one of the rarest of rare scenarios in which you opt to bowl first in modern Test cricket.If India go ahead and achieve the win they are favourites for in Adelaide, they will have shown they have been good enough to cash in on every opportunity presented to them. At home, they won 4-0 despite fielding first four times out of five against England in 2016. Prior to that, in 2013, they blanked Australia 4-0 despite fielding first in all matches. That they can nullify the toss advantage at home, and encash almost every time they have the advantage away is precisely why the tag of the best Test side in the world is well earned.Let’s try to look at what this bat-first advantage translated into on the field in Adelaide. The criticism of India in letting lower-order partnerships flourish has been the spread-out fields for the set batsman. In this innings, India only sent out one extra boundary rider than they normally would for Travis Head. They were much more willing to take a risk here. In the absence of the fear of batting last, India were much more enterprising.Virat Kohli and Tim Paine pose with the Border-Gavaskar Trophy ahead of the first Test•Getty ImagesDuring the said matches that India conceded too many runs to the lower order, it isn’t as if India’s lower order didn’t score runs. Kohli and the tail did that in Birmingham, Cheteshwar Pujara did so in Southampton to even get them the first-innings lead; Kohli had sizeable partnerships with R Ashwin and Ishant Sharma in Centurion, but they were batting last in those matches. That was the difference.This won’t be a pleasant notion for many Test cricket romantics, for a Test win is built on so many small things going right. To suggest that something based on dumb luck probably has a bigger bearing on the result than all those small factors put together can’t be that palatable. But that’s where Test cricket today is, especially when two evenly matched sides are involved.These were two really unlucky sides coming into Adelaide. India had lost seven out of their last eight away tosses. Australia had lost 11 of their last 14 tosses. Somebody had to get lucky. It was just as well that India did because home and toss advantage has been a lethal combination. In this Test at least, toss advantage seems to be trumping home advantage even after a below-par first innings. You’d dearly love to be proven wrong, but chances are high that this series between these evenly matched sides might just be decided by who is batting first more often.

Kedar Jadhav falls for 99, Rajasthan in sight of quarter-finals

Shubman Gill made the highest score of the season so far, Hardik Pandya continued to shine, and both J&K and Kerala won

Saurabh Somani16-Dec-2018Shubman Gill and Hardik Pandya had grabbed the spotlight on day two of the sixth round of Ranji Trophy 2018-19, and both continued to hold sway on the third day too. Kedar Jadhav, however, faced a double heartbreak, for both himself and his team. Three more matches were decided, with Kerala back to winning ways, getting a bonus point against Delhi. The two that had been fascinatingly poised on the second day ended in favour of Jammu & Kashmir and Rajasthan.

Contrasting stories for Rajasthan and J&K
Rajasthan have almost sealed one of the top-two spots in Group C with their fourth straight win, beating Odisha by 35 runs. Rajasthan now have 34 points in six games. The two sides below Rajasthan in the points table, Jharkhand (24 points) and Uttar Pradesh (21 points), are engaged in a match with each other. Each one has two games left after that, while Rajasthan have one. Rajasthan have been in terrific form however, and look set to march on. In this match, Odisha had a target of 173 but in match where the highest score till then was 148, that was a tough ask. Odisha still made a fist of it, but Aniket Choudhary continued his good form with another five-wicket haul to make it ten for the match, bowling them out for 137. It was the second successive narrow loss for Odisha, who had gone down by just two runs against Jharkhand in the previous round.J&K on the other hand, put behind the disappointment of a season of narrow defeats to beat Haryana by 130 runs. On 49 for 4 overnight, Haryana were bowled out for 91. Irfan Pathan had taken all four wickets on the second day and added a fifth. It marked a much-needed turnaround by J&K. Earlier in the season, they had suffered heartbreaks. Bowled out for 95 against Services, they fought back with 261 in the second innings but didn’t have enough in the tank to prevent a defeat. Then against Uttar Pradesh, they took a 102-run first-innings lead only to collapse in the second innings and lose.Kerala meanwhile, returned to winning ways, shooting out Delhi for 154 to complete an innings win and get not only their first bonus point win of the season but also leave behind the defeats of the previous two rounds. Kerala had missed out on a bonus point in two previous wins, losing a wicket while chasing a target below 50. Kerala’s upswing coincided with Jalaj Saxena turning in another good show after two quiet matches. He took nine wickets in the match, and hit a half-century.

Gill’s monumental knock, Pandya’s battle
Shubman Gill was on 199 overnight, and he looked good for a triple once he had gone past his double, until a nicely flighted ball by R Sai Kishore had him coming down the track to be stumped for 268. Gill did have the satisfaction of making the season’s highest score, one run more than Ajay Rohera made during his record-breaking debut in the last round.Hardik Pandya, meanwhile, added 73 but Baroda’s first innings ended at 436, just short of Mumbai’s 465. Baroda will have to be satisfied with just one point unless Hardik can engineer a victory on the final day. He’s already taken two wickets while giving just four runs in six overs, with Mumbai ending the day on 20 for 2.

The Jadhav heartbreak
Overnight on 38, Kedar Jadhav was out for 99 against Saurashtra in his first Ranji match of the season, and to make matters worse, Maharashtra failed to beat the follow-on mark, bowled out 151 runs behind. New Saurashtra captain Jaydev Unadkat – there’s still a Jaydev leading the team – enforced the follow-on and Maharashtra were 157 for 3, though Jadhav hadn’t come out to bat for a second time yet.

ALSO READ – Milind Kumar: from being sidelined in Delhi to 1000 in the Ranji Trophy
Blistering bowling, and the other KohliIndia Under-19 left-arm spinner Harsh Tyagi, who will turn 19 in a week, picked up a career-best 7 for 41 as Railways fought back against defending champions Vidarbha. Having conceded a first-innings lead of 95, Railways rode on Tyagi to bowl out Vidarbha for 147. Set 243 for victory, Railways were 19 for 1, and it’s anybody’s game on the final day.Other bowlers who had a good day were Jharkhand’s fast-bowling pair of Rahul Shukla and Varun Aaron. Shukla took 5 for 65 and Aaron had 4 for 59 as Uttar Pradesh were bowled out for 243, giving Jharkhand a 111-run first-innings lead. These two sides being second and third in Group C and the league phase entering the home stretch, the outcome of this match is vital for both.In the Plate Group, Taruwar Kohli had a heroic day, but Mizoram are facing defeat against Sikkim regardless. Known as the “other Kohli” – he was part of the 2008 Under-19 World Cup team under Virat – Taruwar had moved to Mizoram this season as a professional. He has single-handedly kept Mizoram alive in this match, though they are struggling at 162 for 8, with Taruwar batting on 105 and the target of 341 far away. In Sikkim’s second innings, Taruwar took career-best figures of 5 for 39, and one of his scalps was that of Milind Kumar, the 1000-run man, out for his first duck of the season. In addition, Taruwar had also made 74 out of Mizoram’s 161 in the first innings.

Brief scores

Groups A and B:
Mumbai 465 (Iyer 178, Lad 130, Hardik Pandya 5-81, Bhatt 4-76) & 20/2 (Hardik Pandya 2-4) lead Baroda 436 (Waghmode 114, Solanki 133, Hardik Pandya 73, Dias 4-99) by 49 runs in Mumbai
Maharashtra 247 (Jadhav 99, Sakariya 6-63) & 157/3 (Motwani 65*) lead Saurashtra 398 (Vishvaraj Jadeja 97, Snell Patel 84, Vasavada 62, Sanklecha 6-103) by 6 runs in Nasik
Gujarat 216 (Panchal 74, Shreyas 2-21, Vinay 2-33) & 187/3 (Merai 74, Bhatt 82*) lead Karnataka 389 (Padikkal 74, Shreyas 93, Vinay 51, Chawla 4-99, Nagwaswalla 3-48) by 14 runs in Surat
Railways 236 (Pratham 95, Sarwate 3-66, Wakhare 5-71) & 19/1 trail Vidarbha 331 (Fazal 53, Karnewar 94, Avinash Yadav 5-78) & 147 (Sarwate 39, Harsh Tyagi 7-41) by 223 runs in New Delhi
Kerala 320 (Rahul 77, Manoharan 77, Saxena 68, Shivam 6-98) beat Delhi 139 (Saxena 6-39) & 154 (Warrier 3-39, Saxena 3-49) by an innings and 27 runs in Thumba
Tamil Nadu 215 (Vijay Shankar 71, Gony 5-55) & 166/3 (Abhinav 74, Jagadeesan 50, Yuvraj 2-12) trail Punjab 479 (Gill 268, Mandeep 50, Sai Kishore 6-107) by 98 runs in Mohali
Hyderabad 204/4 (Rohit Rayudu 92*, Himalay 65, Dinda 3-54) trail Bengal 336 (Easwaran 186, Ravi Kiran 4-46) by 132 runs in Hyderabad
Andhra 173 (Sai Krishna 74, Jaiswal 5-50) & 175/1 (Gnaneshwar 89*) trail Himachal 460 (Chopra 65, Kalsi 120, Rishi Dhawan 76, Amit Kumar 65, Golamaru 3-102) by 112 runs in Amtar

Group C
Jharkhand 354 (Jaggi 95, Kishan 54, Nadeem 109, Dhruv 6-105) & 143/2 (Deobrat 70*) lead Uttar Pradesh 243 (Garg 54, Raina 75, Rinku 53, Rahul Shukla 5-65, Varun Aaron 4-59) by 254 runs in Lucknow
Assam 211 (Sinha 56, Pandey 5-74) & 83/3 trail Services 396 (Navneet 79, Paliwal 180, Kalita 3-99) by 102 runs in New Delhi
Jammu & Kashmir 161 (Ajit Chahal 3-31, Yuzvendra Chahal 3-50) & 205 (Owais 71, Ajit Chahal 3-55, Yuzvendra Chahal 4-37) beat Haryana 145 (Rohit 41, Mudhasir 4-50, Umar Nazir 5-55) & 91 (Irfan Pathan 5-18, Umar Nazir 3-29) by 130 runs in Lahli
Rajasthan 135 (Lomror 85, Basant Mohanty 6-20) & 148 (Gautam 51, Basant Mohanty 5-29) beat Odisha 111 (Choudhary 5-49, Tanvir 5-14) & 137 (Suryakant Pradhan 56, Choudhary 5-35, Tanvir 3-39) by 35 runs in Bhubaneswar
Goa 192 (Kauthankar 79, Abhijit Sarkar 4-29, Ajoy Sarkar 3-42) & 113/3 (Prabhudessai 39*) trail Tripura 358 (Pratyush 110, Rajib Saha 68*, Amit Verma 3-87) by 53 runs in Agartala

Plate Group
Bihar 242 (Babul 43, Lakhan 3-30) beat Meghalaya 125 (Biswa 56, Aman 8-51) & 46 (Aman 6-17, Quadri 4-24) by an innings and 71 runs in Shillong
Mizoram 161 (Taruwar 74, Chaudhary 5-57) & 162/8 (Taruwar Kohli 105*, Chaudhary 4-74) trail Sikkim 332 (Milind 139, Sinan 3-74) & 170 (Thapa 44, Bipul 65, Taruwar Kohli 5-39) by 179 runs in Jorhat
Puducherry 136 (Fabid 41*, Deendyal 4-36, Neri 3-28) & 351 (Dogra 139, Fabid 88, Deendyal 4-63, Neri 3-76) beat Arunachal 82 (Fabid 6-29) & 71 (Pankaj 5-25, Rohit 4-7) by 334 runs in Goalpara
Nagaland 207 (Jonathan 69, Dhapola 5-49) & 182/4 (Rupero 85) trail Uttarakhand 557 (Vineet 185, Panwar 101, Kazi 3-124) lead by 168 runs in Dehradun

The World Cup of Mohammad Amir, the nerd

As much as he’s been bowling as part of Pakistan’s attack, he’s also seemed like a child messing around alone in the school’s chemistry lab

Osman Samiuddin at Lord's23-Jun-2019Mohammad Amir’s lawyers knew who he was, but they didn’t really know who he was. Cricketer, young, gifted, Pakistani, now at the centre of this mess. That everyone knew. What his lawyers didn’t know was why there was such a massive fuss about him.One day in 2011, before the spot-fixing trial began, he came into their offices. The idea was for them to spend time with him to find out more about him. He spent the entire day showing them YouTube videos of his bowling. Not to show them how good he was and what the fuss was about. No, he wanted to talk fast bowling, about why fast bowling was what it was, about why he did it and, most importantly, about how he did it.He zoomed into screens and zoomed out and showed them why his wrist was angled like this for this delivery, or why he ran in a little wider for that delivery, why he pitched this ball a little shorter, and that ball a little fuller. Some deliveries did things and he admitted he didn’t know why but he wanted to find out.Howzzat! Mohammad Amir appeals•Getty ImagesOf course the highlights reel was there but what he talked about, and what he showed them, was not what the fuss was about. What he was doing was nerding out about fast bowling, about the one thing he had held dearest to himself, the one thing nobody had yet managed to take away from him, not even himself: the art, yes, but really the science of it.This entire tournament has been about Amir the nerd. Not Amir the boy wonder. Not Amir the swinger. Not Amir the coming pace demigod. Not Amir the redeemed. Ordinarily you would look at that wickets chart, see Amir atop it, put two and two together, and bingo: left-arm fast, England, swing, edges taken, stumps clattered, lbws given. Get me that highlights reel now. Watch on Hotstar (India only): Amir and Shadab wreck South Africa chaseYou wish (you, we all still, really do). It’s not been that. Pakistan’s campaign has been mostly poor and the bowling has been all over the place and back, but Amir? It’s been unfamiliar, is about the most accurate way of telling it. Not electrifying, not taking anyone’s breath away. A paltry two leg-befores out of 15 wickets, none bowled, and of the three caught-behinds, one was Faf du Plessis’ hoick today which could’ve been caught by point running in.ESPNcricinfo LtdHe’s not even come close to knocking sides over. When he got Hashim Amla today, it was his first wicket in the Powerplay that really mattered – the two he got in the West Indies game didn’t, given the game was over (although, as we’ll come to it, they were significant). No tails have been blown away, though the pulling back of Australia in Taunton was close. Watch on Hotstar (USA only) : Highlights of Pakistan’s incredible winThey have not been ugly wickets exactly, but also definitely not the sexy wickets people still crave for him to deliver. They’ve come in the middle overs, off slower balls, from cross-seam bouncers, from cutters really dug into the surface. They’ve come at the death from balls thrown out wide, from wide cutters, from little changes in angle, off poor shots, off batsmen chasing quick runs and Amir reacting to that.Watch on Hotstar (India only): Haris Sohail’s match-winning fiftyOne lasting impression, though – enhanced by the sheer contrast with the rest of Pakistan’s pace attack – has been of a man not lost but playing his own little game in his own little world. This is a world where bowling is taking place for the sake of itself, removed from the world in which the match is taking place. Obviously it has not been exactly that – it’s not as if Amir hasn’t bowled as the team has needed and the situation has demanded.But there’s been something introspective about it, something – not to get too high-falutin’ about it – like an exercise in bowling solipsism. As if Amir has been working out what this Amir can and cannot do, what this Amir’s limitations are, what this Amir’s scope is, what modifications this Amir needs to make to still be successful, and then, as by-product, what this surface requires, what this match-up needs, what is the need of this hour.ESPNcricinfo LtdHe’s been the quickest – and sometimes the only one in his attack – to work out the right lengths on every surface Pakistan have played on, and also the quickest to work out, in the absence of wickets, the right lengths at which he won’t be hit. It has, it can’t be denied, often felt like he’s protecting his figures. But this is cricket, simultaneously an individual and team sport, and so just as with selfish runs, if he’s protecting his figures, to a degree he’s also protecting Pakistan’s.Maybe this has struck you in his celebration of his wickets. Oftentimes their exuberance has felt out of kilter with what’s happening in the match. They’ve been private celebrations just being played out in public, and that has only heightened the sense that as much as he’s bowling as part of an attack, he’s also, like some child, messing around alone in the school’s chemistry lab.That’s why those West Indies wickets were important to him, because after such a dry spell, after all the frustrations with himself, with the public reactions, he needed to work out a way to get wickets, to see if he even could anymore, no matter how they came, no matter the match situation.Ball in hand is the one thing he has known all his life, tape ball and nothing else in it, hard ball and the entire world in it, the one thing he has known will see him through all his life, the one thing he lost briefly, but the one thing he knew would, could, never go, and the one thing that has returned. Different ball, different hand, sure, but there, still there, taking him to a world that awaits discovery.

Dobell: More hand-wringing over top order as England try to persuade Joe Root to bat at No.3

Team management want Root to move up from No.4 in the Ashes, but it will be captain’s call

George Dobell27-Jul-2019There must have been a time – a simpler, happier time – when the conclusion of each Test didn’t precipitate another bout of hand-wringing about the frailties of England’s top-order batting.But like roadworks on the M1, the saga of Brexit and Shahid Afridi’s career, it seems England’s search for a solid top three might really be endless. That Jack Leach, a county No. 11 who came into the Lord’s Test averaging 4.66 this season, now has the second-highest score by an England opener since the retirement of Alastair Cook speaks volumes. As does the fact that the one man with a higher score – Keaton Jennings – has already been discarded.So it was that, hours after England sealed their dramatic victory over Ireland at Lord’s, the England management tried once more to persuade Joe Root to move back to No. 3. No matter that he has said, many times, that he doesn’t want to do it. No matter that, just one Test ago, Trevor Bayliss suggested England had accepted that the side’s middle-order – from No. 4 to No. 8 – was a strength that should not be weakened. No matter that the Burns-Roy experiment had been given just one innings to bed-in. The England management were clearly concerned by the fragility of their side’s batting at Lord’s and continue to look for a new solution.That’s understandable. The top three in action in the first innings at Lord’s have just 11 Test caps between them. The promotion of Root might add some experience and solidity. Rory Burns, in particular, looked short of form and confidence. It wasn’t so much that he twice nicked off, as much as he did it defending a wide ball in the second innings; a stroke that suggested some uncertainly over the position of his off stump and a scrambled mind. He has reached 30 just once in his last 10 Test innings and not at all in his last six. That is not a sustainable run of form. And while the selectors are probably right to give him a prolonged run in the side – England have been down the road of revolving door selections; it didn’t work – Burns will know opportunities are running out. That knowledge won’t make his job any easier.Tim Murtagh celebrates the wicket of Rory Burns•Getty ImagesSo, if the off-field team management have their way, Root will bat at No. 3 (where he averages 40.47) at Edgbaston. That means Jason Roy could move to No. 4 and Joe Denly could open with Burns. By comparison, Root averages 48.00 at No. 4 and 71.44 at No. 5. He has made it abundantly clear he prefers to bat at No. 4 and, as captain, the decision will rest with him.”Joe knows how I feel,” Bayliss said. “It’s been my thought for a few years [that Root should bat at No. 3]. But he’s the captain and he’ll make the final decision. He knows how I feel.”There were other options. Dom Sibley, the top run-scorer in Division One of the County Championship (he has 940 at an average of 62.66), has learned to play much straighter (he has taken to using Alastair Cook’s old coach, Gary Palmer), and has recently enjoyed a run of seven centuries in 20 first-class innings. And while his somewhat old-fashioned approach may not be to England’s current taste – nobody in the top 30 of the Division One batting averages scores as slowly as Sibley (41.44 runs per 100 balls this season) – the selectors may reflect that it is being bowled out too quickly rather than scoring too slowly which is England’s primary problem.In the longer-term, Zak Crawley, the 21-year-old Kent opener, looks an outstanding prospect. It seems, however, the selectors were keen not to risk a potential 10-year career by blooding him six months early and against an especially daunting pace attack. Both he and Sibley – who opened together for England Lions recently – could break into the side before the end of the series, however. James Vince’s star fell during the World Cup but he, too, could yet return.It was surprising to hear Root be quite so critical of the Lord’s surface on Friday afternoon. Not just because it is out of character – if Root has such views, he has tended to keep them to himself – but because if England are going to win the Ashes, they are going to have to play on surfaces assisting their seam attack. So while this Lord’s surface may have been an extreme example of a green seamer, it was hard not to think back to Trent Bridge and Edgbaston in 2015 and wonder how different this really was.To be fair, those 2015 Ashes surfaces were a little better than this. They offered more pace, more even bounce and less lateral movement. And Root may well argue that, having already arranged to use the 2018 version of the Dukes ball – with its prominent seam and propensity to swing for much of the day – his bowlers do not require further assistance. But pitch preparation is not an exact science and Root may reflect that his side are far better suited to surfaces offering too much rather than those offering too little.Certainly it is worth thinking back to the previous couple of Ashes series and remembering what happened when the sides met on good batting surfaces. Whether it was in London (Australia won heavily at both Lord’s and The Oval) or in Australia, England’s seamers struggled for penetration on good batting tracks and the extra pace in Australia’s attack proved crucial. Put a little simplistically: if the Ashes is played on good batting surfaces, Australia may well be favourites.

“You don’t have to be Einstein to work that out”Trevor Bayliss on whether a lack of top-order runs could be England’s biggest obstacle to regaining the Ashes

All of which means England’s batsmen probably face more tough days. And all of which means we probably have to be just a little more understanding of the challenges facing top-order batsmen in England. It is a desperately tough job. It is inevitable that the statistics may look grim. It’s just a question of how much grimness is acceptable.Elsewhere among the batsmen (or the all-rounders, anyway) there might have been a case for replacing Jonny Bairstow (averaging 24.42 in Test cricket since the start of the 2018 English season) with Ben Foakes and a case for replacing Moeen Ali (averaging 17.00 in Test cricket since September 2017) with Leach. But neither was especially likely at this stage. Moeen was the top-wicket taker on both England’s winter tours (albeit equal with Leach in Sri Lanka) and Bairstow enjoyed a good World Cup. Still, that late middle-order – they remain likely to bat at No. 7 and No. 8 – is not quite so daunting as it once was. England will require more from both of them.The selectors also have some difficult decisions to make with the seam bowling. Only James Anderson is, if fit, guaranteed to play (there is every indication he is fit), with the other two specialist seamers (Ben Stokes’ position can be taken for granted) to be taken from a list including Jofra Archer, Stuart Broad, Chris Woakes and Olly Stone.Olly Stone celebrates his maiden Test wicket•Getty ImagesOdd though it sounds for a man who has yet to make his Test debut, Archer is probably an automatic selection if he is deemed fully fit, too. But England are admirably keen to protect a once-in-a-generation asset – not since the emergence of Broad, or perhaps Steven Finn, has an England seamer promised as much – who has not played a first-class game this year. So Archer’s involvement at Edgbaston is not certain. And, with England keen to include some pace in their attack (and with Mark Wood being injured), Stone could yet sneak into the team. His pace, his skills and his control looked every inch Test quality at Lord’s. Woakes’ superior batting may give him a slight edge on Broad, but Broad’s Ashes experience, record and temperament render him a strong contender. Whoever misses out can consider themselves unfortunate.But it remains the batting that is the concern. And much remains reliant upon Root who admitted, after the Ireland Test was won, that “it would be wrong to say I’m not” feeling the exertions of recent weeks. “It’s been 10 weeks of hard cricket of high emotion and of ups and downs,” he admitted. “It does take a lot out of you.”There is much to like and admire about Root. Not least his appetite for the game and his desire for hard work. He is a special player and the natural leader of this side. But he may, at some stage, need protecting from himself. The only game he has missed this year – and it wasn’t even a proper game – was the World Cup warm-up match against Australia. And he only missed that because one of his family died. To give him just two clear days off between the World Cup and this Test and just one between this Test and the start of the Ashes seems dangerously demanding. As does asking him to bat in a position in which he is uncomfortable. The ECB talk a good game about understanding the dangers of anxiety, stress and burn-out these days and they have, no doubt, improved. But until the schedule is tailored to allow for fallow periods, their words will ring hollow.”You don’t have to be Einstein to work that out,” Bayliss sniffed dismissively when asked if an absence of top-order runs could be England’s biggest obstacle to regaining the Ashes. “They have been for the last six or seven years.” That we are still here, juggling players, considering alternatives, desperately searching for a solution, doesn’t reflect especially well on the system.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus